Liveblog: Apple vs Samsung Lawsuit Jury Deicison

| August 24, 2012 | Reply

It took the jury just three days to deliberate over 700 questions that were posed to them in the case. They also decided damages and if patents were invalid that fast. Most expected the jury to work well into next week to come up with the verdict but now Samsung knows exactly where it stands in this landmark patent case. You don’t need to refresh this page as it will refresh on it’s own every 15 seconds.

07:23 PM EDT

That should be about it. Any other details will be posted later in a post. Thanks for joining us.

07:20 PM EDT

This won’t be the end of it as Samsung is sure to file an appeal.

07:16 PM EDT

Correction: .4 billion

 

07:15 PM EDT

It’s not the .4 billion Apple wanted, but this will no doubt make the patent wars escalate even further.

07:14 PM EDT

Samsung walks away with nothing proven, everything lost. They have been awarded no money and sued for over billion to sum it up.

07:13 PM EDT

Has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung is barred by patent exhaustion from enforcing the following Samsung patents against Apple? Yes on 516 and 941

07:12 PM EDT

Has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung has violated Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act by monopolizing one or more technology markets related to the UMTS standard? NO

07:12 PM EDT

Did Apple prove that Samsung breached it’s obligations when developing the UTMS standard?  NO

07:12 PM EDT

Now for the Antitrust suit

07:11 PM EDT

$CONTENT awarded to Samsung

07:11 PM EDT

Apple did not prove any of Samsungs patents invalid

07:09 PM EDT

Samsungs suit against apple: No on all accounts

07:09 PM EDT

Per phone damages: million for the Prevail. Infused 4G: ,792,974, ,123,612 for the Mesmerize, ,123,612 for the Mesmerize,

Transform: 4,060

07:05 PM EDT

The damages: $ 1, 051, 855, 000, 000  Thats just over a billion dollars

07:04 PM EDT

Question 19: trade dress for iPad. No on all devices

07:04 PM EDT

If you found the unregistered iPhone 3G trade dress protectable and famous, for each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC) and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has diluted the unregistered iPhone 3G trade dress?

For SEC: Yes to Fascinate, Galaxy S i9000, S 4G, Showcase, Mesmerize, Vibrant.No for Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Prevail, S2 ATT, S2 i9100, S2 T-Mobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, and Infuse 4G.

For STA: Yes for Fascinate, Galaxy S 4G, Showcase, Mesmerize, and Vibrant. No for Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Prevail, S2 ATT, S2 T-Mobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, and Infuse 4G.

07:03 PM EDT

No for Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Prevail, S2 ATT, S2 T-Mobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, and Infuse 4G.

07:02 PM EDT

For STA: Yes for Fascinate, Galaxy S 4G, Showcase, Mesmerize, and Vibrant.

07:02 PM EDT

No for Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Prevail, S2 ATT, S2 i9100, S2 T-Mobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, and Infuse 4G.

07:02 PM EDT

For SEC: Yes to Fascinate, Galaxy S i9000, S 4G, Showcase, Mesmerize, Vibrant.

07:01 PM EDT

Question 16: If you found the unregistered iPhone 3G trade dress protectable and famous, for each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC) and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has diluted the unregistered iPhone 3G trade dress?

06:59 PM EDT

I don’t know what trade dress means, but only the Iphone 3G was protectable

06:58 PM EDT

Samsung did not prove a single patent invalid according to the jury. It’s just getting worse.

06:57 PM EDT

Willing violation: Yes for all but D’087 and D’889.

06:57 PM EDT

Correction: last question was if Samsung “should have known” it was infringing. Either way Aple is counting dollars by the second right now.

06:56 PM EDT

No, on both galaxy tabs

06:56 PM EDT

#305 Yes for Captivate, Continuum, Showcase, Gem, Indugle, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Vibrant.

06:55 PM EDT

Question 9 — was Samsung willful in its infringement? D’677: Yes for Fascinate, S 4G, S2 ATT, S2 Tmobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, Showcase, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant. 087: Yes for S 4G, Vibrant. No for S2 ATT, S2 Epic 4G Touch, S2 Skyrocket, Infuse 4G.

06:54 PM EDT

Patent 889 claim: Not guilty on all charges

06:54 PM EDT

For STA: Guilty for Captivate, Continuum, Charge, Epic 4G, Fascinate, S 4G, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize and Vibrant.

06:54 PM EDT

Patent 305 claim: guilty on Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy S i9000, S 4G, Showcase, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant for SEC

06:53 PM EDT

for patent 087, guilty on S i9000, S 4G, and Vibrant. No for S2 ATT, S2 i9100, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, and Infuse 4G for SEC. STA guilty on Gal S 4G and Vibrant only.

06:52 PM EDT

Guilty onGalaxy S 4G, S2 Tmobile, S2 Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, Showcase, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant

06:51 PM EDT

Those were the SEC patent claims, next is for STA

06:51 PM EDT

Not guilty for Ace

06:51 PM EDT

On patent 677 claim: Guilty on Fascinate, Galaxy S, S 4G, S 2 ATT, S2 i9100, S2 T mobile, S 2 Epic 4G touch, Skyrocket, Showcase, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant

06:50 PM EDT

Not guilty for Captiavate, Continuum, Gem, Indulge, Nexus S 4G, Transform, and Vibrant

06:49 PM EDT

claim 163: Guilty for Droid Charge, Epic 4G,E xhibit 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy Prevail, S 4G, S 2 ATT, S2 T mobile, Tab, Tab 10.1, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Replenish.

06:49 PM EDT

Not guilty on replenish

06:49 PM EDT

claim 915: Yes for Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Exhibit, Fascinate, Prevail, S 4G, S 2 ATT, S2 T mobile, Galaxy Tab, Tab 10.1, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Intercept, Mesmerize, Nexus, Transform, and Vibrant

06:47 PM EDT

On claim 381, guilty on all devices.

06:47 PM EDT

Samsung is in trouble, next question coming.

06:46 PM EDT

Guilty for Galaxy Tab as well

06:46 PM EDT

Not guilty for Captivate, Continuum, Gem, Indulge, Intercept, Nexus S 4G, Transform, and Vibrant. Guilty for Fascinate.

06:46 PM EDT

Guilty on Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Exhibit 4G, Fascinate, Ace, Prevail, Galaxy X, Galaxy S 4g, S II AT&T, i9100, S II T mobile, Galaxy Tab, Tab 10.1, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Replenish

06:45 PM EDT

Patent 163 decision coming now

06:44 PM EDT

On second claim all but three devices guilty of infringment: Ace, Intercpt and Replenish

06:42 PM EDT

Samsung is guilty on infringing of patent 301 on all devices

As of now Apples lawyers have arrived and Samsungs lawyers have asked for a few minutes to review the documents. Judge Koh is also reviewing some documents at this time.

 

Tags: , ,

Category: featured, Liveblog, Tech News

About the Author ()

Co-owner and Editor-in-Chief of GizmoNinja.com.

During the day I work in graphic design and also do photography. By night I try to play with programming and code of all different types. I love the opportunity to write for the site and hope to see it grow as time goes on.